2009 MECA Survey

2010 MECA Conference Evaluation

February 8 — February 10, 2010

Please rate each of the following on a scale from 5 to 1 with 5 being the best rating and 1 being the worst rating.

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
Overall rating of the concurrent sessions I attended
Overall rating of the hands-on sessions I attended
Presenters attitudes & knowledge
Relevancy of concurrent sessions offered in the program
Keynote speaker Dr. Tim Tyson
Quality and selection Breakfast Food
Quality and selection Break Food
MECA Provided Lunch (Wednesday)
Length of Conference 1 = Too Short 3 = Perfect 5 = Too Long
Hands-on registration process
CEU/SEMI process
Size of the meeting rooms
Conference registration process
Door prizes
Quality and helpfulness of vendors/exhibitors
Hotel room accommodations
Hotel reservation process
Quality and atmosphere of meeting rooms
Conference bags and items
Helpfulness of MECA board members
Quality of hands-on lab equipment
Board member election process
Overall rating of conference

Please answer yes or no for the following.

	YES	NO
I visited exhibitors in the Exhibit Hall
I attended a roundtable discussion.
I used Twitter or visited the MECA Ning Site?
I plan to attend MECA 2011.

In which hotel did you stay during the conference. (Leave blank if none)

Approximately how many MECA conferences have you attended?

Please feel free to make comments on the following.

If you rated any of items 1-23 with a 3 or lower, please indicate your reasons and what MECA can do to improve this score?

If there were one or two people that stood out, please mention them below—these could be presenters, speakers, and/or board members that might have helped you personally OR which made a positive impact on your attitude to take technology back to your classroom.

Please list any comments that would be helpful as we plan for MECA 2011.

    If you were a presenter:
    Please comment on any issue you may have encountered, good or bad,
    that you believe the MECA Board should be aware of.